LinkedIn Now Prevents Connections & Endorsements From Being 100% Public

LinkedIn recently made a significant change to the way Recommendations are viewed, where you cannot see the name of the endorsing party, unless you are linkeded as a 1st-degree connection to that particular individual.

Instead of “I highly recommend Bob for his leadership capabilities,” by Tom White, CFO at Any Company, you’ll now just see the recommendation itself, with no information on who wrote it, their career level, or how they even know the original user. 

Given that one of LinkedIn’s strongest points has been the ability to gather and leverage public endorsements as references, this change strikes a blow to the credibility and usability of Recommendations – especially from a recruiting standpoint.

Some people read these endorsements as a measure of whether they’d like to connect with another user–and recruiters often take Recommendations as evidence of strong job performance. Now, they won’t be able to filter out the reciprocal (meaningless) colleague-to-colleague endorsements.

Taking it a step further, you are now prevented from allowing all LinkedIn users to view your Connections list. The options (go look this up in your Settings) are only “My Connections” or “No one,” meaning that if you want others to see your network, you’re out of luck.

Many of my clients have benefited from reviewing my Connections list and Recommendations in advance of hiring me, noting the caliber of executive and professional clients who have been thrilled with my work (although the overwhelming majority of my executive clients are in the midst of a stealth job search and we therefore do not link directly).

Without this information, the Recommendations list seems as if it has been reduced to volume only (“21 people have recommended Bob”).  Of course, endorsements can be written to add “I was a direct report to John at XYZ Company,” but how many people will remember to do that?

I’d like to hear your thoughts. Does this change water down the strength of LinkedIn as a networking or recruiting tool?

4 thoughts on “LinkedIn Now Prevents Connections & Endorsements From Being 100% Public

  1. Wes says:

    I totally agree! I wonder why LinkedIn made these decisions? Maybe the “premium” membership still offers this capability?

  2. Naishadh says:

    I completely agree with you. I find this move without any substantial logic and reasoning; it not only puts limit of one’s professional brand, but decreases the chances of being connected by potential hiring managers/recruiters. This move defeats the one of the fundamental purpose of being on LinkedIn.

  3. Darrell says:

    I mostly agree. It would be difficult to evaluate the endorsements the way LinkedIn is now. People could actually write their own endorsement and only the 1st connections could tell.

    Then again; I wonder how important endorsements truly are. They always reference the good in a person’s character.

    What would be of more interest might be an honest and “kind” criticism.

    Yes, a few recommendations are valuable, but I like to look at work histories and how the profiles are written. As Laura is well aware, you can really evaluate a person by the way a profile is constructed.
    .

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.